FMEA for developers

Gopalakrishnan M
5. September 2025
Categories: Technology

Introduction

Imagine you are developing an automotive cluster, a medical infusion pump, or an industrial controller. Your code compiles, your unit tests pass and the product works perfectly in the lab. But what happens in real life if the cluster screen freezes at high speed, the infusion pump delivers the wrong dosage, or the industrial motor controller stops in the middle of a production line? These are not just minor inconveniences, they can cause safety risks, financial losses, and in some cases, life-threatening situations.

This is where Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) comes in. More than just a quality exercise, FMEA is a systematic method to identify potential failures before they occur, analyze their impact, and plan corrective actions. For developers, it is best understood as a proactive form of debugging, anticipating bugs and design weaknesses before they even appear in production.


What is FMEA?

FMEA stands for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. It is a structured approach used to identify the possible ways a system, component or process can fail, understand the effects of those failures, and prioritize them for mitigation. At its core, FMEA is about asking “what could go wrong” and then taking action before the failure ever reaches the end user.

For developers, this translates into thinking critically about software modules, APIs, or system interactions and listing out all the possible ways they could break. It is not about catching one specific bug but about creating a mindset that expects failure and prepares defenses.


FMEA for developers

Why Developers Should Care About FMEA

Many developers assume that FMEA is something handled by system architects, quality teams, or functional safety engineers. But the reality is different. In embedded automotive and industrial systems, software is one of the leading contributors to failures. Standards like ISO 26262 for automotive systems or ISO 14971 for medical devices explicitly require structured risk analysis, often performed through FMEA.

From a developer’s perspective, participating in FMEA offers several advantages. It leads to writing safer and more resilient code, helps you understand dependencies across the system, and reduces firefighting in late stages of development. Most importantly, it positions you as a developer who prevents problems rather than just fixing them. Considering that fixing a bug in production can cost ten to a hundred times more than catching it early, FMEA can save enormous time and resources.


Types of FMEA Relevant to Developers

FMEA is not a one-size-fits-all activity. Depending on the scope, there are several types. Design FMEA (DFMEA) focuses on design elements, both hardware and software. For example, what happens if the watchdog timer initialization in your code fails? Process FMEA (PFMEA) focuses on the processes that create the product, such as manufacturing or testing. For developers, this might mean asking what happens if firmware flashing intermittently fails during ECU production.

Another critical type is Software FMEA (SFMEA), which looks specifically at software components, logic, and APIs. An example here would be analyzing what happens if a buffer overflow occurs when parsing incoming CAN bus data. Finally, at a higher level, there is System FMEA, which considers the entire system behavior. A relevant case might be a power glitch causing multiple ECUs in a vehicle to reboot simultaneously.

For developers, Design FMEA and Software FMEA are the most actionable, because they directly tie into coding, debugging, and architecture.


Core Concepts in FMEA

When you look at an FMEA worksheet, you will encounter columns with terms such as “Failure Mode,” “Effect,” “Cause,” “Severity,” “Occurrence,” and “Detection.” These are the backbone of the method.

A Failure Mode is simply how something fails, such as an API returning null unexpectedly. The Effect is the consequence of that failure, for example, the cluster UI freezing. The Cause is the underlying reason, such as uninitialized memory. Failures are rated using three scales, Severity (how bad the effect is for the user), Occurrence (how often it might happen), and Detection (how easily it can be detected before reaching the end user). Multiplying these three gives the Risk Priority Number (RPN), which helps prioritize which issues need attention first.

For developers, the most valuable contribution is in identifying realistic failure modes, their likely causes, and ways to detect them programmatically.


How Developers Can Practice FMEA Step by Step

Getting started with FMEA does not require waiting for a formal company-wide exercise. Developers can begin practicing it within their own modules. The first step is to define the scope clearly. Don’t try to analyze the entire system at once. Pick a specific module, such as CAN data parsing, a firmware update handler, or the UI rendering engine.

Next, brainstorm failure modes by asking how the module could fail. For example, a missing CAN frame, an incorrect checksum validation, or a deadlock in the UI thread. Then, identify the effects of those failures. A missing CAN frame might result in the wrong speed being displayed to the driver, while a deadlock could freeze the entire system.

The next step is to list possible causes such as null pointers, race conditions, or an uninitialized hardware driver. Once these are identified, assign rough ratings for severity, occurrence, and detection. Even if the numbers are not perfect, starting with approximate values is better than skipping. Multiplying them gives you an RPN, which tells you which risks are most urgent.

Finally, plan mitigations. These could include adding exception handling, using a watchdog timer, strengthening unit tests, or implementing a firmware rollback mechanism.


Example: FMEA for a Firmware Update Module

Consider a firmware update handler in an automotive ECU. A simple FMEA table might look like this:

  • If the update file is corrupted, the effect could be a boot loop. The cause may be a missing CRC check, which rates high on severity and detection. The mitigation is to add CRC verification before flashing.
  • If the update is interrupted, the ECU could be bricked. The mitigation is to implement a dual-bank firmware with rollback capability.
  • If there is a version mismatch, the ECU may show incompatible behavior. The mitigation is to validate the manifest file before updating.

Even this small example shows how developers can immediately spot critical risks and plan solutions before the first field issue is reported.


Common Pitfalls Developers Should Avoid

One common mistake is treating FMEA as a simple paperwork exercise. It is a mindset, not just a form to fill. Another mistake is overcomplicating the scoring system. In practice, approximate numbers are good enough, especially in the early stages. Developers also often assume that FMEA is a hardware activity, ignoring software aspects that are just as critical. Finally, FMEA must be updated regularly. A static FMEA document that is never revised quickly loses relevance.


Tips and Tricks for Practicing FMEA

Developers can use practical shortcuts to make FMEA more effective. Unit tests and static analysis tools can be considered “detection mechanisms” in the FMEA process. Whenever you design a feature, ask yourself: What is the worst thing that could happen if this fails? Doing a mini-FMEA before submitting code for review is a great practice. Similarly, FMEA insights can justify additional test cases or design changes during sprint planning.


Conclusion

FMEA encourages developers to think about failures upfront, structure your reasoning, and deliver robust, reliable products.

At Embien Technologies, we have seen the benefits of this first-hand. Whether it is a CAN bus issues in an automotive cluster, a rollback requirement in a medical device firmware, structured FMEA has helped us catch issues before they ever reached the field. Developers who actively participate in FMEA not only strengthen their code but also raise the overall quality of the system.

In future blogs, we will explore the different types of FMEA in more detail and provide hands-on examples that you can apply directly in your projects.

Related Blogs

ARCHITECTING SAFE EMBEDDED MEDICAL PRODUCTS

This blog explores how layered architecture, processor choices, and safety principles enable design of reliable, life-critical medical systems.

Read More

DESIGNING MEDICAL SOFTWARE

This blog explores how medical product development ensures safe, certified devices (IEC 60601, ISO 14971, and IEC 62304) for reliable, compliant, and innovative patient care.

Read More

OTA ARCHITECTURE FOR SCALABLE DESIGNS

Now a days in 2022 due to technology growth, a product is having multiple features/use cases and it has been upgraded for bug fixes and new features in the interest of customer/end.

Read More

INSTRUMENT CLUSTER DESIGN FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES WITH RENESAS RL78

In any vehicle, the instrument cluster forms a critical part as it is the face of the vehicle that reflects the current state.

Read More

Subscribe to our Blog


15th Year Anniversary