Firmware security vulnerabilities expose critical attack vectors that threaten product integrity at the foundational level. Firmware attacks have surged 2227% in the US since 2017, creating persistent threats that can compromise entire systems. Firmware operates as the foundational trust layer, meaning successful attacks grant attackers deep system access, enable persistent threats, and can cause permanent device damage.
With new regulations like EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), NIS2 Directive, Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), and many others around the world, it is important to avoid one of most dangerous of the 7 modern day sins of product engineering. This article covers some of the common firmware vulnerabilities and need for continuous updates.
Common firmware vulnerabilities
Product firmware frequently contains exploitable weaknesses that create straightforward attack paths. The most prevalent security gaps include:
- Memory safety issues - Buffer overflow conditions persist as primary firmware vulnerabilities, especially in products developed using C or Assembly languages.
- Insufficient authentication - Products lacking proper firmware update verification allow unauthorized code installation.
- Third-party component risks - Unvetted component integration creates security gaps that often lack timely security patches.
Successful firmware exploitation enables attackers to bypass system-level security controls, escalate privileges, execute undetected operations, and potentially render devices permanently inoperable.
Secure boot and encryption essentials
Secure Boot establishes device security foundations through startup code integrity verification. Proper implementation ensures only manufacturer-authorized firmware executes on the device.
The verification process depends on cryptographic databases: signature databases (db), revoked signatures databases (dbx), and Key Enrollment Key databases (KEK). These databases store in firmware non-volatile RAM during manufacturing and control executable code permissions.
Firmware update protection requires robust encryption implementation. AES encryption with CTR mode provides efficient protection for variable-size firmware packages.
Ongoing firmware update strategies
Maintaining current firmware versions represents essential security practice. Organizations should establish automated update mechanisms and utilize existing operating system update infrastructure where feasible.
Secure update implementation follows three primary approaches: single-slot overwriting, two-slot verification, or recovery-based methods. Each strategy must incorporate version control mechanisms that prevent downgrade attacks from replacing secure firmware with vulnerable versions.
Effective firmware updates require cryptographic signature verification and power-failure resistance during installation processes. This systematic approach converts firmware from security liability into foundational system protection.
Conclusion
It is critical that the product being designed has secure firmware running in it with its confidentiality, integrity and authenticity ensured. Our cyber-security engineers make sure that any instruction that is executed on the device or data being transmitted/received are valid and from OEM’s. Our secure coding process also ensure there are no vulnerabilities, and the attack surface is kept to the minimum. Reach out to our team today to protect your electronic assets.
